Teaching
Focusing Principles as a Way to Encourage “Natural Focusing”
Rationale-
Eugene Gendlin’s first discovery in studying outcomes in therapy
patients was that there was something that successful patients ALREADY did. If
they were doing that process, which Gendlin named Focusing, then the relationship and
environment in the therapy setting was more able to help them make progress
with their challenges.
Even without
learning how to do or to guide others in Focusing, we can learn some principles
and practices that allow our interactions and workplaces to be more
Focusing-friendly, more supportive of this natural process. In these
environments, more connection, understanding, and creativity occur.
Advantages
of this form of teaching
a)
As a non-experiential presentation, this can be
easily offered to large groups in a
presentation format, with far fewer
logistical requirements than experiential teaching of Focusing requires.
b)
This is a way that helpers and caregivers
(teachers, administrators, clergy, parents, etc) can
learn some easily applicable concepts
and practices to help those whom they support, even if they are unable or not yet ready to take an
experiential workshop
c)
Those in
charge of systems have great leverage to influence the culture and processes of
that system. With these principles, administrators, classroom teachers, and
others, can influence many people who function within those systems, for the
better.
d)
They are rapidly applicable to many situations,
so the benefit can be almost immediate
e)
Having these principles can act as “handles” for those who HAVE had more formal training in
Focusing to help them hold onto something conceptually as well as only felt.
Disadvantages
of this form of teaching
a)
One is not
taught a direct experience of the Focusing process in their body. Learning
principles, one can THINK the Focusing process, but one may not get to develop a feel of it in their
bodies
b)
Focusing is much more than thinking, so simply
thinking about Focusing is limited.
c)
Years of experience with Focusing training
brought to the surface some problems with attempting to teach Focusing
experientially with a too thin ratio of trainers to students.
d)
One may not
reap the personal benefits of Focusing if they only apply the principles
e)
This process does not offer much in the way of guiding another. It is more of a holding
space and encouraging. When more is needed, then more than simply applying
principles is necessary.
What this
might look like?
(Note: This
has now also become one of the modules. And, several of the modules could even
be adopted here, under Focusing Principles. So, they are less distinct, but
better integrated now)